The book under review is India Unbound – From Independence
to the Global Information Age. 2015, Penguin, Kindle eBook
I wanted to read this book for a long time. Many scholars
had quoted Gurcharan Das. The references to the book had attracted my
attention. Therefore, I wanted to read this book. I did not read it for a long
time. The price was too high, or I did not have the buying power to obtain this
book as I did not find it of immediate concern to me. I am a teacher of
history. I was seeking authors who were the academicians. Gurcharan Das was a
writer, and he was from the corporate world. Secondly, he was writing about
current history and biography. It was nearly a decade back the academicians
like Bipin Chandra wrote 'India after Freedom Struggle'. Almost at the same time,
Ramchandra Guha came out with 'India after Gandhi'. I read both of them. That was
expected of me. Gurcharan Das work did not qualify the criteria of the
selection list. However, there were references to his autobiography in some
writings talking about history. I read 'Marwaris' recently. There are numerous
references to Gurcharan Das. On one fine day, I casually rechecked the book's
availability in the Kindle section of Amazon. I found that the price was within
my reach and I bought it. It was during the reading of Marwaris that I did it.
I had not completed the reading of Marwaris when I started reading this book
in-between.
A history teacher has read the book by Gurcharan Das. The
teacher had already read many references to Gurcharan Das in many essays from
academicians. Now, the teacher had a first-hand experience to go through the
contents. A history mindset was trying to read a reminiscence of a writer who
had experienced the corporate world at the topmost level. The writer of India
Unbound had lived a life of a corporate head in the field of fast-moving
consumer goods (FMCG). The trade goods are consumed by a common, unknown,
struggling to survive human beings and the people from the elite classes. The
people dealing with such goods cater to the whole spectrum of the social
classes. They have their experiential learning of the activities on the ground
as they happen. The things which happen is history. They may not be
academician, but they observe history as it has to be observed. The only
difference is that a historian works in an archive or with the already existing
data. The experiential learner has to learn to follow the data as it comes in
touch with his senses. Such a learner may be an academician or CEO of an FMCG
company or a writer. If he is scientific in his temperament, he knows how to
select the relevant data and then put it to formulations guided by an ideology
or just pure analytical skills and formulations to derive a conclusion that can
be used by practitioners from different fields of human activity. (Not by the
scientists dealing with forces covered under the subject of physics and related
sciences.)
After reading the book, I will not call it an autobiography
of the writer. How can it be that when the author was hardly 55 years old? It is an introspection guided by his critical evaluation.
The book has three sections. They are as follows.
Part one – Our Spring of Hope – 1942-65
Part two – The lost generation – 1966-91
Part three – The Rebirth of Dreams 1991-99
The above-mentioned brief is the table of content. In the
part-three, the content refers up to July 2000.
The book was released in 2000.
The edition which I have read contains an additional chapter
which is titled Afterword 2007.
The edition is 15 Anniversary Edition. An impressive essay
has been added in the year 2014. However, the book remains
confined to 2000.
At the end of the book, there are Notes, and it is recommended that the
reader should also go through the notes. It has developed as a footnote
reference. It is given in a unique way and does not follow the prescribed method of
academic papers.
The Acknowledgement section also deserves the reading. It
mentions leading scholars from economics, sociology, history, journalism,
social workers and political scientists. It is needed to get a correct glimpse
of the whole work. It must be read along
with the Notes section.
I will borrow the author's phrase to call it a 'personal
account of events and ideas' of the author about Indian history. It should not
be called an autobiography. It is a personal account of ideas about a
particular period with India as a central stage. The component of 'personal
events' has to be dropped. They are used as garnishing over the pudding. Therefore, it is not a biography as such.
If I am asked to recommend this book for reading, then my
suggestions will be as follows.
I will ask the student of history who would like to study
the historiography of the Colonialism in India and its impact on Indian history to read
the first section of the book which is called ‘Our Spring of Hope’. A similar
survey can be done through the book of B. R. Tomlinson. In the book of Tomlinson, one can find all the
author's perceptual thinkers whom he has sought to develop his personal account of ideas for the
first section. In addition to that the Cambridge Economic History of India by
Dharma Kumar and Meghana Desai, the students of Irfan Habib, Volume II can be read to know the actual drift of the discourse of Gurcharan Das. The author had questioned Irfan Habib's thesis in the Notes about India's economic situation
at the advent of the East India Company. The author claims that Bipin Chandra had gone
through the manuscript of the book. Irfan Habib and Bipin Chandra had strongly
contested Morris D Morris's views as given by the last-mentioned scholar in the
Cambridge Economic History of India. Even then, the author had questioned the thesis.
In the case of students who want an economic and a sociological view of modern India after Independence, I would recommend that
they read the second section of 'Lost Generation'.
Section three is a set of essays which contains the
personal views of the author.
On the whole, the author has skirted away from the political events of
Modern India after Independence. There are many issues which can be pointed out
here wherein the author had just steered away from studying the impact of the
working of democracy during the period called by him 'Lost Generation'.
The book appeared in 2000. If I am right then by 2005, Bipin Chandra and Aditya Mukherjee (A historian who has shifted from economics) wrote the book India after the Freedom Struggle. In 2007, Ramchandra Guha came with his India after Gandhi. In his book, Ramchandra Guha has made a pertinent observation that the study of history in Modern had stopped with 1947. After that, history has been studied by the faculty of Economics and Sociology. The book by Gurcharan Das could have been before the eyes of Prof Guha while making such observation. If one reads the books by Guha and Bipin Chandra, the study gap will be clear.
Gurcharan Das has given the thesis that the rise of
Democracy and Capitalism are two historical forces which should have developed in
India in synchronization. The industrial revolution had not rightly taken place in India. In place
of the Industrial Revolution, the revolution in the service sector has taken
place and even that after 1991. He had passed this judgment without considering
the significant historical developments that had taken place during the period
of the Lost Generation. He mentioned the Emergency and Mandal Commission but did
not elaborate much on giving that where had the democracy failed. Actually, at
every stage, he had avoided discussing the major political issues faced by
India. He had tried to collect only Economic and Sociological ideas for that
period. One of the reviewers on Amazon had expressed his dissatisfaction on the
Caste System in India, which stands as a single chapter in that section. There
are many gaps of a similar kind.
Gurcharan Das is a Management Guru. He had headed P&G at
the highest level. He is an active columnist in a leading newspaper. He is
maintaining his website also. How far he has given lessons on Management in this book, is an
issue which only a management person can tell. It is another thing that he had
recollected many anecdotes of his life when he tried to promote Vicks Vaporub
as a management trainee.
In the third section, Gurcharan Das had tried to draw a
picture of emerging India. He has talked about the success stories of the
Indian entrepreneurs. He has talked about Ranbaxy. But he is mum about the
failure of Fortis, the Religare and the Vial of Lies or Anil Ambani or Satyam. The
author has mentioned that he is being asked to write its second part also. But
I believe that he will not do that.
Anyways, it is a good book.
Next Reviews:
Indian Musalman by W. W. Hunter
A Nation in Making, Being the Reminiscences of Fifty Years
of Public Life by Sir Surendranath Banerjea.
India After Gandhi by Ramachandra Guha
Books by Sumir Sharma
